a conversation about space - physical and virtual - how it shapes our interactions and how our interactions shape it
14 Jul
Hello,
I just read an interesting article by Elizabeth Cline titled “Building Without Walls” in SEED Magazine, and I wanted to share it with you since I think it is related to our discussions on objects, spaces, design, art and science. I’ve already read similar discussions on this blog, so maybe this is a good opportunity for a second round of opinions.
Cline argues that “a new breed of architectural objects, inspired by theoretical science, is changing how we think about building and what counts as art.” She does that by referring to “Transitory Objects,” an exhibit at Vienna’s Thyssen-Bornemisza Art Contemporary gallery. The exhibit, according to Cline, goes forward in collapsing the boundaries between architectural objects, conceptual art, and theoretical science. Having that in mind, the architects embrace the impermanence of their work and engage in a process of producing structures that follow scientific laws and principles. As such, they are probably never finished, but continuously adapt to their environment and use.
I particularly like the argument of “letting go of determinist ideas of structural planning - suggesting that a city’s infrastructure should always be adapting.” However, I did not find an emphasis on the users or inhabitants of these structures as their co-producers or co-adapters. Cline repeats at the end of her article the idea of fragmentation and incompleteness in architectural design, and quotes Daniela Zyman (the curator of the exhibit) in saying that “the architect has to decide at which point the algorithm stops.” And the point of decision reflects the moment of maturation of the architect. I think the fluidity and openness of the structure actually invites the users to jointly select the algorithm, and thus, the architect is no longer a lone individual, but part of this ecology.
Going back to AL and Aileen’s installation, the question is what were its ‘walls.’ Beyond the physical walls and panels, my guess is that the biggest walls were those which facilitated predictability of the process. Same applies to this blog. Having said that, do we remove these walls and how? Or are we more interested in building temporary walls as reference points and guidance. I don’t think I’m very squared in my thinking, but its hard for me to hang a picture frame without any walls
Best,
Bojan
2 Responses for "“building without walls.” what are the walls of this space?"
Thanks Bojan for sharing this article with us.
I like your point re. the involvement of users as co-designers of the process. I guess it is hard for architects as well as it is for designers to let go complete ownership and involve users to the point where they become co-designers. I remember debating this idea with engineers, computers scientists when I was working on participatory design projects. Users are nice but they don’t really know what they want, they don’t know what is good design, they don’t know what is possible, etc. To some extent these statements are probably true but that’s why the dialogue and the co-design makes sense.
I am not sure I understand what you mean by “those which facilitated predictability of the process”?
As for what were the walls in the installation buidling_space_with_words, this is an excellent question! I am not sure… The panels were metaphors of walls but there were also constraining people’s movements, paths, and affording certain moves. There were also the “walls” enacted by the discursive practices that emerged from the blog discussion as well as the “walls” created by the technology - how to post, how to log in, etc.
Last, I can’t agree more with your last point on hanging a picture frame. I always give the example that although there’s always a social interpretation of physical objects, environment, at the end of the day, one cannot go through a closed door.
Thanks for reviving that discussion,
al
to add to your discussion, check also essays:
http://web.mit.edu/d_rosen/www/d_rosenberg_smarchs_2009.pdf
http://plannedsp.blogspot.com
http://unspecifiedform.blogspot.com
arguments that are v. relevant to your discourse, best, steven
Leave a reply